How Did Sukadeva Become an Impersonalist Even He Knew That Krishna is Supreme?

ASK BVKS | August 2, 2012 |

English;

Question:

How was it possible that Sukadeva Goswami became an impersonalist (Brahmavadi) but then became attracted to Krishna’s personalistic activities?

I ask this because I have heard from senior devotees that Suka is parrot of Radharani and that in his form as a parrot, he heard Bhagavatam from Lord Siva while he was explaining it to Mother Parvathi.

Also Sukadeva Goswami remained in the womb of his mother (Bitika) for around 16 years as he refused to come out. But after Krishna assured him that he will not be attracted by His Maya energy, then he came out. This means that Suka knows Krishna is supreme. Then how did he become an impersonalist.

Audio answer:

Play (4 m 20 s)     Download (4 MB)    

You can mark interesting parts of the page content and share unique link from browser address bar.

Mark




Related Lectures

Yukta-vairagya is not an Excuse

February 1, 2014 |

English; Rajapur, West Bengal, India

Purusattama, Vinaya

December 7, 2016 |

English with తెలుగు translation; Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Questions and Answers, Part-2

July 28, 2016 |

English with Русский translation; Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Devotees or Demons

July 20, 2017 |

English; Gauragrama, Telangana, India

Horticulture yoga

September 11, 2014 |

English; Nottingham, England

Indians are the Chosen People

May 21, 2011 |

Question: Why Krishna has favored India as his appearance place often? Why is this biased?

English;

Guru Does Not Cheat

September 17, 2012 |

English; New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

  • Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta 3.4.102-103

  • 50 m 2 s  |  22.9 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Affectionate Avatars

May 16, 2011 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Guruvayur, Kerala, India

Did Lord Rama Worship Shiva?

August 30, 2011 |

Question: The question is not available now.

English;

Mahidharah, Mahabhagah, Vegavan, Amitasanah

August 21, 2014 |

English; Drumshanbo, County Leitrim, Ireland

How to Identify Namacarya?

November 19, 2011 |

Question: In Sri Bhaktisiddhanta Vaibhava, volume 3 – Genuine and False Gaura Bhajana, Page 81, Srila Sarasvati Thakura makes a point that namacarya free from namapradha and namabhasa can give the Holy Name. And further that one should take shelter of a "pure namacarya". How does this apply in today's context within ISKCON, how does one know who is a namacarya to receive the Holy name from or approach for shelter?

English;

Citing Srila Prabhupada, Part-2

August 3, 2016 |

English; Lika, Croatia

  • Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta 1.7.38

  • 46 m 23 s  |  21.2 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Seems true but isn't

April 7, 2007 |

English; Pune, Maharashtra, India

Yugadikrt, Ugavartah, Naikamayah

January 27, 2014 |

English; Kolkata, West Bengal, India

  • Viṣṇu-sahasranāma 301-303

  • 58 m 31 s  |  26.8 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Damodara-vrata in Hari-bhakti-vilasa, Part-2

October 11, 2014 |

English; Gauragrama, Telangana, India

Insubstantial Niceness

July 17, 2014 |

English with Русский translation; Dobromysh, Tatarstan, Russia

Initiation of Astika, Mahotsaha, Satyavak and Vaisnavi

August 14, 2016 |

English; Seattle, USA

The Principle of Parampara Continues

August 15, 2015 |

English; Lika, Croatia

Gaudiya Matha and Householders

December 3, 2012 |

Question: I have been speaking w various devotees about the standard for grhasthas regarding initiation. I am sure you saw my post on the sannyasa conference. One devotee wrote back to me the following: An afterthought: It strikes me that in the Gaudiya Math during Bhaktisiddhanta's time, the math was strictly a place for brahmacaris and sannyasis. My guess:… Expand>

Question:

I have been speaking w various devotees about the standard for grhasthas regarding initiation. I am sure you saw my post on the sannyasa conference. One devotee wrote back to me the following:

 

An afterthought: It strikes me that in the Gaudiya Math during Bhaktisiddhanta's time, the math was strictly a place for brahmacaris and sannyasis. My guess: The presupposition seems to have been that householders were/are more clearly separated from the renunciants because of their marital engagements, including especially sexuality, which I don't know that Bhaktisiddhanta specified must be for procreation only among householder disciples (would be interesting to know if there is any info on this).

 

Do you have any info on the above?

^ Show less

English;

About Gaura Arati

January 2, 2005 |

English; Perambur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India