Sravanam Kirtanam to keep out Kali
Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.8.4 | January 26, 2017 |
English; Srirangam, Tamil Nadu, IndiaPlay (55 m 50 s) Download (25.6 MB)
September 3, 2012 |
English; Denver, Colorado, USA
February 16, 2011 |
English; Baroda, Gujarat, India
May 26, 2011 |
English; Govindadvipa, Ireland
March 4, 2012 |
English; Valsad, Gujarat, India
September 13, 2014 |
English; Bleasby, Nottinghamshire, England
December 26, 2013 |
English; Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
October 9, 2014 |
English; Gauragrama, Telangana, India
October 31, 2011 |
Question: I am currently listening to your lecture "Some Concerns About ISKCON." I also heard a lecture recently from my spritual master HH Tamal Krishna Goswami. He said, "originally, Srila Prabhupada wanted ISKCON to consist solely of brahmacaris and sannyasis, but then Jadurani came, what was Srila Prabhupada to do? He couldn't reject her."… Expand>
I am currently listening to your lecture "Some Concerns About ISKCON." I also heard a lecture recently from my spritual master HH Tamal Krishna Goswami. He said, "originally, Srila Prabhupada wanted ISKCON to consist solely of brahmacaris and sannyasis, but then Jadurani came, what was Srila Prabhupada to do? He couldn't reject her."
It seems that since we do not discriminate who joins ISKCON in terms of their varna or ashram, ISKCON will continue to face these sorts of issues (i.e. Ksatriya Initiative).
My question: Although I understand that we are ultimately only concerned with becoming Vaishnavas, but do you forsee that ISKCON as a society will gradually evolve into strictly a brahminical body as Srila Prabhupada wanted or will the brahminical class be forced to create a seperate body to offer guidance to society? Thank you for maintaining the standard.^ Show less
March 27, 2016 |
June 19, 2011 |
English; San Jose, California, USA
May 27, 2011 |
Question: Who is called perfect Vaisnava? Those who follows four regulative principles and chant 16 rounds japa daily or who has through knowledge of sastras?
August 30, 2011 |
Question: The question is not available now.
August 13, 2016 |
English; Seattle, USA
December 3, 2016 |
English with తెలుగు translation; Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India
June 30, 2012 |
English with தமிழ் translation; Zurich, Switzerland
August 5, 2016 |
English; Lika, Croatia
August 15, 2017 |
English with తెలుగు translation; Kukatpally, Hyderabad, India
October 31, 2013 |
Question: I have been wondering, (1) Why chanting the name of the Lord is considered to be service. How are you serving the Lord by just chanting His name? (2) Why chanting the name of the Lord is considered to be glorification of Him. When are we glorifying him while chanting?… Expand>
I have been wondering,
(1) Why chanting the name of the Lord is considered to be service. How are you serving the Lord by just chanting His name?
(2) Why chanting the name of the Lord is considered to be glorification of Him. When are we glorifying him while chanting?
Answer by HH Bhakti Vikāsa Swami:
Why is it considered to be service to Kṛṣṇa to chant His names? Because He likes to hear His names chanted and He says to chant. This is His order. So if you follow the order you are doing service. Serving someone means to act, if it’s in the case of a subordinate or an equal, it means to act for their benefit and if for a superior, it means to act for their pleasure. So Kṛṣṇa likes to hear His own name. So chanting His name is His order. That’s mentioned in Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta, that Vallabha Bhaṭṭa came to Caitanya Mahāprabhu and made the objection that Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Lord, so in that sense He is like the husband of everyone, but according to śāstra the wife shouldn’t say the husband’s name, so you shouldn’t chant the holy name. Caitanya Mahāprabhu replied to this rather odd objection that the most important for the wife is to follow the order of the husband. So the order of Kṛṣṇa is to chant His name, so we should chant it.
Where is the glorification? How are we glorifying Him by chanting? It might not seem to be glorification if we just say the name, nāma kīrtana. If we say Kṛṣṇa is powerful, He is beautiful, we can say that’s glorification. That’s specifically called guṇa kīrtana – to speak on the qualities of Kṛṣṇa. But nāma kīrtana is also glorification in the sense that by repeatedly saying His name in an attitude of reverence that’s certainly glorifying Him. That means that we take Kṛṣṇa very seriously and we are asking others to do so also, bringing Kṛṣṇa to others’ attention. So that is also glorifying. We‘re not chanting the name of anyone else. You can go, someone living in the next building, his name might be, for instance, I don’t know the names of anyone living there, but there might be someone there theoretically called Piyush Caudhari. So we are not chanting Piyush Caudhari, Piyush Caudhari, Piyush Caudhari… If we did, it would be remarkable because no one living in the apartment here is so remarkable that we want to chant their names, especially not repeatedly. But Kṛṣṇa is so extraordinary and rememberable, worthy of thinking about – smaraṇīya - that we want to remember Him by chanting His holy name. The very fact we are chanting is glorification, we are chanting His names. It shows His importance.
English; Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
May 22, 2010 |
English with தமிழ் translation; Yercaud, Tamil Nadu, India
January 3, 2016 |
English; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India