Can Christianity be Accepted as a Part of Vaisnava Life?

ASK BVKS | October 31, 2013 |

English; Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Question:

How has Christianity come to be accepted as part of Vaishnava life? There are several devotees I know who also claim to be Christians, how can this be? I do not see how these two can go together since they worship different gods. The biblical father god encouraged blood offerings for sin, that is NOT Krishna consciousness or at least not as I see it. I may be wrong about this so I decided to write to you for an answer.

Audio answer:

Play (5 m 37 s)     Download (2.6 MB)    

You can mark interesting parts of the page content and share unique link from browser address bar.

Mark




Related Lectures

Approach Radha through Gaura

September 2, 2014 |

English; Simhachalam, Germany

  • Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta 1.4.55-56

  • 1 h 45 m  |  48.4 MB

  • Download
  • Play

Management in Gaura Lila

June 25, 2011 |

English; Scarborough, Ontario, Canada

Leadership in Krsna Consciousness

January 25, 2016 |

English; Somnath, Gujarat, India

Keeping Srila Prabhupada in the Center

May 14, 2011 |

English; Guruvayur, Kerala, India

Perfect Disciples try to Relieve the Situation

August 25, 2017 |

English; Udupi, Karnataka, India

Maha Tapa, Sarvagah, Sarvavit, Bhanuh, Vishvaksena

September 1, 2012 |

English; Denver, Colorado, USA

Talking About Maya, Durga-puja, Part-1

October 1, 2014 |

English; Nanda Gokulam, Telangana, India

Visvakarma

June 30, 2012 |

English; Zurich, Switzerland

Is My Intention Good Enough?

May 6, 2011 |

Question: In a lecture at the philosophical camp 2011, Baroda, Your Holiness gave a lecture titled "Path to hell is paved by good intentions". I have two questions related to this lecture: 1) Your Holiness said that one may think that his intentions are good, but it may not be good enough and one may… Expand>

Question:

In a lecture at the philosophical camp 2011, Baroda, Your Holiness gave a lecture titled "Path to hell is paved by good intentions". I have two questions related to this lecture:

1) Your Holiness said that one may think that his intentions are good, but it may not be good enough and one may not even know that. So how to ensure that one's intentions are good enough? Is that possible one may try his best to be good intentioned still his effort is not good enough?

2) Your Holiness mentioned that there are some main points that one must understand, then other misunderstandings can/will be cleared in a course of time. But Your Holiness didn't describe these main points. So if I can know which are these main points that one should understand?

^ Show less

English;

Vamana-katha

|

English; Manchester, England

Suksmah

February 12, 2016 |

English with తెలుగు translation; Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India

Celebrating Hindu Festivals at ISKCON Temple

October 21, 2011 |

Question: Is it necessary or correct to celebrate Hindu festivals such as Siva Ratri, Holi and other such events in ISKCON temples?

English;

Hi, What is the Purpose of Life?

June 8, 2011 |

Question: Hi! It's a cliche question and many must have asked you, "what's the purpose of life?" Is it only a means of ensuring the sustenance of human race, some doing ordinary, some extra ordinary and all going back? How do I know what's best for me?

English;

Krishna's Assuming Forms

August 28, 2012 |

Question: I would like to ask for clarification of one subject, namely, Krishna's "assuming" different forms. In one of the classes that had been uploaded on the bvks.com you spoke about the Lord not "assuming" the form, as far as I remember, you made the point that these forms of the Lord do exist eternally and that… Expand>

Question:

I would like to ask for clarification of one subject, namely, Krishna's "assuming" different forms. In one of the classes that had been uploaded on the bvks.com you spoke about the Lord not "assuming" the form, as far as I remember, you made the point that these forms of the Lord do exist eternally and that the forms of the material world are the "copies" and not the other way round. You also made the point that the word "assume" should probably not be used in the verse.

Today we were listening to the class by Srila Prabhupada and he also spoke on the topic and this is what he said:

"So sometimes this earthly planet was thrown into the water, Garbhodaka-samudra, Garbhodaka Sea, and God took the form of a boar, having two tusks — because it was easier. Just like shovel, you take something like that. So He took the earth. So that is described: ksitir iha vipulatare tisthati tava… No. What is that? Dasana-sikhare? The, this is described in Jayadeva's prayer. Vasati dasana-sikhare dharani tava lagna. Vasati, "is resting"; vasati dasana-sikhare, "on the top of the tusk." Kesava dhrta- sukara-rupa jaya jagadisa hare. So He's yajnesa. It is not that He's… is shape was just like hog, but He's not hog. Don't misunderstand. His shape was a gigantic hog. You can just imagine what kind of hog He was. The shape was like hog, but He was resting the whole planet, earthly planet, on the tusk. Vasati dasana-sikhare dharani tava lagna sasini kalanka, kesava dhrta- sukara-rupa. Here it is stated, saukaram. Saukaram means like hog. Not that He's hog. He's yajnesa. He can take any shape. Just like here is, God has assumed the shape of a lion, half-lion, half-man. So He's all powerful, He can take any shape, any form, but He is not that form. That is for the time being. For the time being, He assumes so many forms. The real form is Krsna, the original form. Kesava dhrta-sukara, sukara-rupa or sukara-rupa. "My Lord Kesava, You have assumed this form." So there are many millions and millions of forms of God. According to time, necessity, circumstances, He assumes different forms. Because it is His business:

yada yada hi dharmasya
glanir bhavati bharata
abhyutthanam adharmasya
tadatmanam srjamy aham
[Bg. 4.7]

He appears as soon as there are discrepancies in the methodical way."

>>> Ref. VedaBase => Srimad-Bhagavatam 1.3.7 — Los Angeles, September 13, 1972

I remember discussing this very same point with Gokula Candra Prabhu when we were in Salem, and the conclusion was that these forms do exist eternally, but from the above statement by Srila Prabhupada it seems to be otherwise. Could you clarify that please so that I may understand this properly?

^ Show less

English;

Burping, Belching, Spitting, Farting and "Excuse Me" Etiquette

January 6, 2014 |

Question: Our son Yadunandana (4.5 yrs) came one day after the school (run by devotees) and asked why he had to say "excuse me" after belching. We can hear Srila Prabhupada sometimes making heavy noises during the class and we have seen many sanyassis pass air or belch and say nothing. Could you please explain how one should behave according to vaisnava ettiquete when one happens to burp, belch or spit etc. while with others?

English; Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

Cheating Christian Conversion

May 14, 2016 |

English with தமிழ் translation; Mappedu, Sriperumbudur, Taml Nadu, India

Manidhara Prabhu's Vyasa-puja offering

August 20, 2006 |

English; Moscow, Russia

Martyrs of the D-day

April 12, 2014 |

Question: I have a doubt in my mind, and you could most likely solve it. Sannyasa is the highest ashram and generally the sannyasis are respected as being; as good as God by other sections. I hear stories about Prabhupada offering sannyasa to many of his devotees, and many of them could not maintain it. During the early stages of the Krishna Conscious movement, was Prabhupada very careful in choosing candidates for Sannyasa?… Expand>

Question:

I have a doubt in my mind, and you could most likely solve it.

Sannyasa is the highest ashram and generally the sannyasis are respected as being; as good as God by other sections. I hear stories about Prabhupada offering sannyasa to many of his devotees, and many of them could not maintain it.

During the early stages of the Krishna Conscious movement, was Prabhupada very careful in choosing candidates for Sannyasa? I hear stories that sometimes many of the devotees were given Sannyasa on a single day and were asked to go out and preach (please correct me if I am wrong).

Is the spiritual master supposed to understand the possible frailties of his disciples very carefully and give instructions only according to the disciple’s capacity? I hear this argument that the strength to carry on the instruction is imparted with the instruction itself.

Is it possible that the spiritual master may give an instruction, but if he is not very helpful to the disciple then the disciple has to take a simpler instruction for himself after the failure?

How does giving instructions work in the current context? We have many madhyama bhaktas acting as leaders, so are we supposed to check with others when there are strict instructions (other than chanting and regulative principles) and strong ideas presented that are directly not in Prabhupada's books - like preaching, program building etc.?

^ Show less

English; Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

Hare Krishna Bhajan

January 24, 2015 |

English; Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India